By Tom Winnifrith, The Sheriff of AIM | Thursday 15 August 2019
Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from ShareProphets). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
A cornerstone of the Muddy Waters attack on Burford (BUR) is that it booked 2013 profits on a case its client Napo lost and, as we showed here lost before the accounts were finalised. Burford’s defence is that this refers to a different Napo case but it failed to say which one. Well, reader Drunken Sailor has – I think found it. Sadly this second case fails to substantiate the Burford rebuttal at all, it makes it look even weaker. Over to Drunken who posts…
Become a member starting at £6.99 per month for all articles, the Bearcast, and our seven year archive.
Filed under:
Thursday »
Wednesday »
Tuesday »
Monday »
Sunday »
Saturday »
Friday »
Thursday »
Wednesday »
Tuesday »
Monday »
Sunday »
Saturday »
Friday »
Thursday »
Wednesday »
Tuesday »
Monday »
Sunday »
Thursday »
Wednesday »
Tuesday »
Monday »
Sunday »
Saturday »
Friday »
Thursday »
Wednesday »
Tuesday »
Monday »
Time left: 04:59:31