ShareProphets : tidm

DAY

Daisy Group (#DAY) publishes pretty dismal interims but has been taken over so irrelevant

2014-12-31 00:50:58

Daisy Group – recommended cash offer provides a reminder

Having on Friday announced that a now 185p per share possible cash offer for Daisy Group (DAY) from a consortium of Toscafund Asset Management, Penta Capital and CEO Matthew Riley was being considered, the following updates with such an offer now being recommended to Daisy’s shareholders.

By Steve Moore | Published 2014-10-20 11:01:17 |

Daisy Group – update as takeover saga continues

IT services and unified communications provider Daisy Group (DAY) has revealed that a consortium of Toscafund Asset Management, Penta Capital and CEO Matthew Riley are “now considering a possible cash offer for the company at 185p per Daisy share”. The following updates after I originally commented in August on the back of a 190p per share approach from the consortium.

By Steve Moore | Published 2014-10-18 06:13:02 |

Daisy Group – what to do following preliminary takeover approach?

Having risen to above 190p following the announcement of a preliminary takeover approach earlier this month, shares in IT services and unified communications provider Daisy Group (DAY) have settled back at 188.5p. In the following I review this further “possible offer” situation on the London markets.

By Steve Moore | Published 2014-08-27 10:58:21 |

The Top 6 stocks to buy on AIM this week: 3 & 4 – Daisy Group and Greenko

The Closet Chartist has once has served up a special report on the six stocks on AIM you should be buying as a trade this week. Number 3 and 4 on the list are Daisy Group (DAY) and Greenko (GKO)

By The Closet Chartist | Published 2014-01-27 09:09:52 |

previous 0 Page 1 of 1 (5 articles) next 0

Latest News

Show All

BREAKING: Has Optibiotix really received 2 takeover approaches or is Steve O’Hara just a really naughty boy?

Xeros Technology – “developments in its Commercial Laundry sector”, attempted ramptastic?

Tom Winnifrith Bearcast: should Andrew Webley come to Sharestock again & will bitcoin have collapsed by then?

Zoo Digital – interims emphasise “Return to growth, materially improved profitability and cash generation”, but how significantly and sustainably?…

Laughable & not sustainable

Marechale – how about an update on the $118m Aussie Coral spoof?

Video: The US Needs A ‘Much Higher’ Gold Price – Here’s Why

AB Dynamics – full-year results, what does “Repositioning with purpose” mean financially?

AIM will lose 4.5% of its entire value in one fell swoop on December 8

Skins NED appointment – not very diverse & comes with a Bixby Edwards stink

Recent Comments

TOM11 Nov 2026

So there is never any such thing as GroupThink inside the bubble?

Skins NED appointment – not very diverse & comes with a Bixby Edwards stink

SEADOC11 Nov 2026

Do I come to sharestock to make money? No, I come for entertainment. I enjoyed Andrew's (erroneous) views last year, please invite him again . I hope to be able to attend in person again

Tom Winnifrith Bearcast: should Andrew Webley come to Sharestock again & will bitcoin have collapsed by then?

JOHN BROWN11 Nov 2026

We are all infinitely diverse from each other therefore diversity and diversity targets are false prophets.

Skins NED appointment – not very diverse & comes with a Bixby Edwards stink

TOM11 Nov 2026

in terms of diversity its a bit like the board of er um er an AIM listed company where all 5 directors are white middle class males aged 50-67, I'm struggling to think of its name can you assist?

Skins NED appointment – not very diverse & comes with a Bixby Edwards stink

TOM11 Nov 2026

Now that you are part of the AIM establishment...In the old days companies graduated to the MM in an orderly fashion and were replaced by new young companies that would use AIM to growNow there is a rush of good companies to escape and bugger all good small companies joining to replace themThat is different.

AIM will lose 4.5% of its entire value in one fell swoop on December 8

Eric_Tricity11 Nov 2026

I read the RNS yesterday morning before reading this now (wednesday morning) and after looking at the board's make up had exactly the same thought. There is ZERO diversity here, it is female dominated and the fact that they are of an age where they might have one eye on retirement makes it even worse. For other reasons as well I cannot see this bunch driving the company forward.

Skins NED appointment – not very diverse & comes with a Bixby Edwards stink

Eric_Tricity11 Nov 2026

Companies leaving AIM to go to the main market is a sign of success for the AIM market as these companies have listed on AIM, become larger and outgrown the market and are now being promoted. This is exactly the same as a footy team being promoted from the Championships to the Premier. You know this but you paint it as being bad for AIM which will all know it isn't. Yes AIM is full of shitcos but you should not be trying to twist success into failure.

AIM will lose 4.5% of its entire value in one fell swoop on December 8

ENTERNAMEHERE11 Nov 2026

I gotta say the idea of slashing fuel taxes is a really good one, they are way too high, ok, so the government make a vast amount of money off these taxes but if inflation went down and then base rate they would be paying so much less on government debt... Extra money would be in peoples pockets, companies wold be making more money and greater taxes that way.

Tom Winnifrith Bearcast: should Andrew Webley come to Sharestock again & will bitcoin have collapsed by then?

TOM11 Nov 2026

ok so moneterism is wrong & fuel driving inflation so what is wrong with my idea of slashing fuel taxes, eliminating inflation and thus allowing rates to be slashed?What's wrong with my idea is that MV does always = PT

Tom Winnifrith Bearcast: should Andrew Webley come to Sharestock again & will bitcoin have collapsed by then?

MAYFAIRMAN10 Nov 2026

As you were unwilling to check the data about money supply I did it for you. The broad definition of money preferred by the BoE, M4ex did indeed grow by 4% in the last 12 months to September, but that growth was not driven by Government spending or borrowing. It was due to money creation by the private banking sustem. In case you don’t understand the mechanism, let me explain it. Most broad money is created when commercial banks make loans. A mortgage or business loan creates a matching deposit, and that deposit is counted in M4ex. The recent data fits this: mortgage lending is growing at about 3.6% a year, consumer credit at around 9%, and borrowing by large businesses at over 10% (June figures). If private lending grows faster than money, other items must be pulling the other way. That would fit quantitative tightening (the Bank's gilt sales), plus bank funding that isn't counted as money. Government borrowing is large but it is mainly financed outside the banking system and so does not involve printing money. You have fallen into the monetarist fallacy, just because money printing causes inflation, it doesn’t mean that all inflation is caused by money printing. To that extent Milton Friedman was wrong.

Tom Winnifrith Bearcast: should Andrew Webley come to Sharestock again & will bitcoin have collapsed by then?