Oh dear, Oh dear, poor old Lord Michael Howard, the former Tory leader, does not seem to be having terribly good luck with his Non-Executive Directorship career. To stumble into one Serious Fraud Office investigation (Quindell) might seem unfortunate. To stumble into a second (Soma Oil & Gas), which was announced yesterday, seems like carelessness.
Already a member? Sign in
• All premium articles
• Tom Winnifrith’s Bearcast
• Access to all the entire nearly 13 year archive
• ShareProphets Daily Newsletter
Cancel any time
This area of the ShareProphets.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ShareProphets.com. ShareProphets.com does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ShareProphets.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ShareProphets.com and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions.
Comments
My Left Armpit
Here you go…
http://www.somaoilandgas.com/page/anti-bribery-and-corruption-and-risk-management
Anti-bribery and Corruption and Risk Management
Soma Oil & Gas has a zero tolerance approach with respect to its Anti-bribery and Corruption policy, procedures and implementation and complies with all applicable laws and regulations of the countries in which it operates.
“Soma Oil & Gas is committed to upholding high standards of ethics, transparency and accountability in the oil and gas industry and fully supports and promotes an extractive sector free of corruption. We have decided to build a long term sustainable business in Somalia and intend to invest both in its ethical infrastructure and in the communities in which it works. From inception, we will build a corporate culture based on fundamental values including fairness, ethics and integrity in its business dealings, which is compliant with the highest standards of relevant legislation in the world. A zero tolerance policy towards bribery and corruption will form the basis of Soma Oil & Gas compliance framework which will be designed to protect its brand, its employees, its third party business associates and its stakeholders from the risks associated with bribery, corruption and extortion”.Lord Howard of Lympne CH, QC, Chairman of Soma Oil & Gas
All employees of the Company and its affiliates are required to comply with the Group’s Anti-bribery and Corruption policy.
Presumably he was talking about the Somalians… Cough. Anyway those are his words and you might hope he will stand by them.
My Left Armpit
Oh…
http://t.co/rX7qJ6wbFw
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/33747169
Looks like the beeb scooped first and give a more ‘refined’ take on what might be going on.
its me
In order to get E&P rights in most African and Latin countries a “signature bonus” has to be paid. This is always in cash and paid to the people in charge of issuing the licences at the Ministry. It works in either of two ways, the people who set the company up pay this personally and take the money back post fundraising or it is agreed prior to funding that once the company comes to market and is funded the “cash” is then taken out and paid in return for the permit/s.
Entries in the management accounts and subsequently the FY audit are as other items not associated as a “signature bonus”. Therefore, generally with E&P in Africa there is nearly always a breach of the UK Bribery Act. The SFO could go on forever. Lastly try and find a NOMAD who could tell you what a signature bonus is? Most will not know because this aspect of the deal never crosses their desk and is kept hidden from them. They are only aware of the cost that the Ministry invoices which is part of the verification and reporting accountant proccess.
Lastly a teaser!
Lets assume a QE found out about the signature bonus and the QE needed one more transaction to ensure their continued QE status would he/she
a) Resign from the transaction or b) Continue?
Due to the flawed AIM rules for NOMADS I know which my money would be on.