Aiden Earley – as Some Documents go Down (pro tem) the Killer Worthington/.Rangers document emerges

Comments

1. ---

   turbograndad

   7 March 2015, 09:19

   Tom,
   Ahhhhhhh, very interesting my dear Watson, the plot thickens, spuriouser & spuriouser, I trust theres another copy that is signed, or they will plead it was for a laugh.
   Dumb & dumber, have you got someone at GCHQ Tom ?????????, well it works for the Government, us presumably

2. ---

   Sweet Karolina

   7 March 2015, 09:41

   I hope Doug enjoyed the replacement holiday for the one ruined when Aiden’s cheque bounced freezing Doug’s bank account.

   Yep there is no chance of you getting your legal costs back from this scumbag.

3. ---

   pink53

   7 March 2015, 09:49

   Deary, deary me. I hope that is a draft. It is almost as bad as the other “agreements” we have seen. Still if not there is a chance of a negligence action against whoever drafted it in the unlikely event it was done by someone purporting to have skill and knowledge.

4. ---

   Temptress

   7 March 2015, 10:50

   There is no way that this document was drafted by a lawyer(I would hope!!). I hope you are not being sold a dummy with this one Tom.

5. ---

   ROB

   7 March 2015, 11:13

   Not sure about this, not signed or dated. It is not even possible to understand part 3 (outstanding cash) which is just a mess of figures which make little sense. It is not even decipherable , just scrawl. I mean, a ruined holiday and someone has agreed to pay for it, no figures or dates seem to relate to this. Interest at £2000 per month for a £20000 loan? Wonga would be proud, could not describe an agreement like that as kissing and making up.

6. ---

   wildrides

   7 March 2015, 11:33

   Thing is its not signed or dated and as such is not proof of anything other than someone can use Word in microsoft office.

7. ---

   Phil

   7 March 2015, 14:06

   Wildrides
   Maybe not, but it is possible to prove it. There will be an audit of the payments in Part 3 – Outstanding cash. Although the press. nor me or you has right to access bank and credit card accounts, the Police do, I would deem this a line of inquiry.

   Temptress

   I have seen worse documents drafted by lawyers than this one, including mega expensive ones like Herbert Smith. Before Herbert Smith come crawling all over me, I should add that all to often when you need a lawyer, get a good one, and despite this comment I rated H Smith as the best I dealt with.

8. ---

   Bob

   7 March 2015, 17:13

   Whilst it looks like poorly slapped together drivel it seems to follow a particular meme in as much as, one, other document[s] Tom has been forced to take down, ‘pro tem’, have, IIRC, the same look and feel to them. Holiday gone wrong.. if someone dies etc. Perhaps it is the ‘way the lawyer writes them’, presumably he was properly instructed, but much of it and the rest comes across as ‘If you give me your sweeties I’ll be your best mate’. It’s not as if Doug Ware’s ‘rebuttals’ via the Worthington website lend him much credibility…

   http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-31753934

   I know nothing but go figure. If the material Tom is publishing has been obtained ‘illegally’ by h4331ng someone’s computah then they should have immediately put the NCA, AKA the Police, on him rather than pissing away holiday/shareholders money to lawyers without a clue in respect of CPR in order to take part in a Gucci Handbag Fight in an effort to see who runs out of, someone else’s, money first.

   I would assume that Tom’s previous publications, from e-mails and their attachments, come with a verifiable electronic ‘paper trail’. I might also assume that the person who delivered them is, in Tom’s view, trustworthy. By extension this, not, recent ‘I’ll be your best mate if you give me your sweeties’ document.. in Tom’s view, comes from a reliable source.

   http://i.imgur.com/N1h1×8m.png

   Dates and name. This is why documents get ‘sanitised’ via the printer scanner route. Obviously someone has set up their computer with Office Word 2007 and set its export date to 2011. It’s a very trivial thing to do under Windows….. Cough.

   Apparently ‘the other’ Mandy Archer [Mandelson/Archer] deals with Childrens Books which, in my view, kind of summarises what is going on here. I guess that in this case Mandy is a collateral secretary.

   Oh

   “It’s not as if Doug Ware’s ‘rebuttals’ via the Worthington website lend him much credibility…”

   Whilst I appear to have donated enough for a ‘free pizza’ according to messages elsewhere the place is shitty, smelly pisshole with rats and the staff are morose foreign scum.

   Blah Blah Blah etc Blah

9. ---

   hammer69

   8 March 2015, 02:29

   Tom,

   Ref a), suggest you correct as DW actually became CEO of WRN on 1 June 2012.

   The BB morons will otherwise as usual trash the piece because of this “outrageous lie”…

   H69