Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from ShareProphets). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Jim Sutcliffe is the deputy chairman designate of Quindell (QPP) and is also a Fellow of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries and in that spirit I have written him a letter which was emailed over today. Let’s see what he says. But I pose a tough question or two for lucky Jim.
Already a member? Sign in
• All premium articles
• Tom Winnifrith’s Bearcast
• Access to all the entire nearly 13 year archive
• ShareProphets Daily Newsletter
Cancel any time
This area of the ShareProphets.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ShareProphets.com. ShareProphets.com does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ShareProphets.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ShareProphets.com and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions.
Comments
turbograndad
Tom,
Lets see how these prestigeous big hitters, really are.
Duck and cover, flim and flam, pomposity of no responce incomunicado, can’t say anything because its preduditial, PWC are conducting forensic accounting, so can’t presume, bullshit, bollocks, and claptrap me lod.
turbograndad
Tom,
Or “ I’m only here for the beer “, remember that one, now its coke and hookers.
Don’t give up the day job.
lloorre
Afternoon Tom
2 quick ones on the Code, you quote.
1. “A breach of the Code is not necessarily, of itself, grounds for disciplinary action. However, where a member’s conduct is called into question, failure to observe the Code may be taken into account by any Disciplinary Panel.”
2. “Scope [of the Code]: “The Code applies at all times to members’ conduct in their work as actuaries, but will also be taken into consideration where their conduct in other contexts could reasonably be considered to reflect on the profession.”
Anyone else see a “Get out of Jail Free” card?
Thanks
wildrides
I expect his legs felt a wee bit wibbly wobbly after reading that .
larboulois
LLOORRE – your ‘Get out of Jail Free’ card observation is similar to ‘Except in Exceptional Circumstances’ clauses which get attached to share option and share sales lock-in periods.
So I wouldn’t be holding my breath Tom; if the IFoA show as much due diligence in the ‘world’ which they’re supposed to govern as the FSA and those other financial bodies apparently do in theirs, naff all will happen and your letter will be a complete waste of time.
quazie123
Tom
i can assure you that Mr Sutcliffe is not giving a flying fart about his institute of actuaries, Jesus H they presided over the mother of all screw ups known as the UK pension industry shortfall. IMHO Actuarial qualifications are not worth the toilet paper mate, they didnt see low interest rates coming, or for that matter, us folks living longer, so on that basis alone, why would they get I the slightest bit interest in one of their own going for a bit of the old cash nosebag at Quindell. You’re pissing in the wind there I reckon but good on you for red flagging Scum companies and their shafting of shareholders, regards Q12