Disclosure: The author has a short position in one or more of the shares mentioned. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from ShareProphets). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
IGAS (IGAS) has today tried to clarify share trades made by its CEO Andrew Austen. It has failed abysmally and now needs to clarify its clarification. This is a farce and the advisers - the lamentable Jefferies – should be walking the plank right now.
Already a member? Sign in
• All premium articles
• Tom Winnifrith’s Bearcast
• Access to all the entire nearly 13 year archive
• ShareProphets Daily Newsletter
Cancel any time
This area of the ShareProphets.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ShareProphets.com. ShareProphets.com does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ShareProphets.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ShareProphets.com and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions.
Comments
Creation
Looks like one of the temporary staff at IGAS has written today`s rns.The original rns on 16th Jan 2014 refers to “Equities First Holdings” and today`s “Energy First Partners LLP “ Ooops
Sweet Karolina
The IGas ADVFN BB does not seem to be full of morons like QPP, they get it:
“gutterhead 14 Nov’14 – 18:17 – 487 of 488 1 0
He should be sacked, greed before the responsibility to shareholders is unforgivable. The board should have taken action and on the basis of that pathetic statement, they should also be replaced.
Some one in that company needs to get a grip. He is threatening all of their livelihoods, they should linch him before a shareholder does.
Austin is literally the 6m dollar man.
I will see him at the agm if he has the nerve to show his face.”
Jonathan
The bit I find most amusing is that they cant even get EFHs name right in a damn rns! Clearly they are paying a 4 year old to be their proof reader!
Jonathan
Perhaps another letter should be sent asking if they have pledged their shares to two different companies?