UK 19:15 Wednesday, 23 September 2026
Breaking news and expert analysis on fast-moving AIM and LSE listed shares
Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from ShareProphets). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Spain-focused uranium play Berkeley Energy (BKY) says it expects to start site work in mid-2016 at its key Salamanca project in west-central Spain following official approvals from the country’s Ministry of Industry, Energy and Tourism, the European Union and various, national, regional and provincial authorities. Listed on AIM and Down Under, the company’s shares have nearly doubled since midsummer to 20.75p, as investigation of the project continues to show encouraging volumes and grades, at a time when new nuclear power projects, which need uranium, are under active discussion in the United Kingdom and around the world.
Already a member? Sign in
• All premium articles
• Tom Winnifrith’s Bearcast
• Access to all the entire nearly 13 year archive
• ShareProphets Daily Newsletter
Cancel any time
This area of the ShareProphets.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ShareProphets.com. ShareProphets.com does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ShareProphets.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ShareProphets.com and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions.
Comments
J P Spaghetti
“at a time when new nuclear power projects, which need uranium, are under active discussion”
Nah – thorium would be the way to go, Robert, and many current reactor designs would require little effort to be converted to burn it (more plentiful than uranium and no weapons-grade by-products, so why won’t they listen – it’s too important for geopolitical posturing?)!