Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from ShareProphets). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
My attention is drawn to an article in the Daily Mail from 2011 which I suggest that all Quindell (QPP) followers might wish to consider. Back in June 2012 Quindell bought Silverbeck Rymer for £12 million in cash and 96.666667 million Quindell shares.
Already a member? Sign in
• All premium articles
• Tom Winnifrith’s Bearcast
• Access to all the entire nearly 13 year archive
• ShareProphets Daily Newsletter
Cancel any time
This area of the ShareProphets.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ShareProphets.com. ShareProphets.com does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ShareProphets.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ShareProphets.com and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions.
Comments
wildrides
Blimey ………never mind the the telematics when you can buy a load of ambulance chasing “ner do wells” making false whiplash claims who have turned themselves into “ do very well thankyou’s “
It just gets better and better !
AA man says to customer when arriving at breakdown “ are you deaf “ if client says no then AA man hits client on ear with spanner saying “you are now” …… theres another £700 refferal fee .
Tom W
Fillthylucre
You are an obvious shit but just to reply anyway.
My motivation? To write stories which interest me. If they interest others ( which our record traffic suggests they do) that is a bonus.
Innuendo. Oh no my friend. Let me explain the ethics of my trade. To run a story claiming it is yours when in fact it has appeared elsewhere is not good form. So I credit the daily Mail as it had the story.
There is no innuendo here and the Mail has sourced it fully. The Law society fined the senior guy at Silverbeck Rymer for stealing clients money. No innuendo just fact. Not made up by The Mail but straight from the Law Soc
Given QPP ponied up millions of quid for this chap’s firm I would have thought that highly relevant.
Tom.
DiscoStu
Tom, just for the sake of complete accuracy, it was the Solicitors Regulation Authority which said that James and Charles Rymer failed to comply with rules 1, 3 and 9 of the Solicitors Practice Rules 1990, including failing to act in the best interests of clients.
The story was covered by the Law Society Gazette at the time, November 2009, here: http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/53228.article
Tom W
Filtylucre
The fact that Jim Rymer was “done” by his regulator for trousering 117k of client money is of no interest?
Really?
Your blind eye on QPP matters speaks volumes
T